In A 1991 Film, Shell Oil Issued A Stark Warning About Climate Change Risks

In A 1991 Film, Shell Oil Issued A Stark Warning About Climate Change Risks

22:45 Add Comment





WASHINGTON — “Action now is seen as the only safe insurance.” 


That was among the many clear warnings that oil giant Shell issued in a film it produced about climate change more that 25 years ago. Many environmentalists, however, argue that the company has largely ignored its own alarm bells.


The 1991 film, “Climate of Concern,” resurfaced Tuesday on the Dutch online news outlet The Correspondent. It’s the latest in an ever-growing body of evidence that suggests the oil industry has long known about the climate risks associated with carbon dioxide emissions — and has actively worked to cover them up.


“The need to understand the interplay of atmosphere and oceans has been given a new sense of urgency by the realization that our energy-consuming way of life may be causing climatic changes with adverse consequences to us all,” the nearly 30-minute video notes. 


The film is eerily prophetic, warning of spiraling global temperatures, a sea level rise that could prove “disastrous,” wetland habitats inundated by salt water and ferocious storm surges brought on by warming ocean temperatures. 


“What is now considered abnormal weather could become a new norm,” the film’s narrator says.  


“In a crowded world subject to such adverse shifts of climate, who would take care of such greenhouse refugees?”


According to The Correspondent, which shared the video with The Guardian, the film was produced for the public eye, particularly for viewing in schools and universities, but has gone largely unseen for many years. In a separate 1986 document reviewed by both publications, Shell reportedly wrote of the uncertainties regarding climate science but noted that “changes may be the greatest in recorded history.”


In an interview with The Correspondent, professor Tom Wigley, the former head of the Climate Research Unit at the University of East Anglia, which assisted Shell in creating the film, spoke about the accuracy of its predictions. 


It’s amazing it’s 25 years ago,” Wigley said. “It was quite comprehensive on what might happen, what the consequences are, and what we can do about it. I mean, there’s not much more.”


Along with linking fossil fuel consumption and rising carbon dioxide emissions to warming global temperatures, the film celebrates renewable energy technologies, including solar and wind. Although Shell does recognize climate change and made investments in wind energy, it is also a key player in the destructive and dirty Canadian tar sands.



In an email Tuesday to The Huffington Post, a Shell spokesman said, “Our position on climate change is well known; recognizing the climate challenge and the role energy has in enabling a decent quality of life. Shell continues to call for effective policy to support lower carbon business and consumer choices and opportunities such as government lead carbon pricing/trading schemes.”


But environmental groups aren’t convinced that the company has walked the walk when it comes to acting to combat climate change.


“The fact that Shell understood all this in 1991, and that a quarter-century later it was trying to open up the Arctic to oil-drilling, tells you all you’ll ever need to know about the corporate ethic of the fossil fuel industry,” Bill McKibben, the co-founder of 350.org, said in a statement. “Shell made a big difference in the world ― a difference for the worse.”


In the film (which can be seen in full here), Shell warned that while global warming was not fully understood, “many think that to wait for final proof would be irresponsible.” 


“Whether or not the threat of global warming proves as grave as the scientists predict, is it too much to hope that it might act as the stimulus, the catalyst, to a new era of technical and economic cooperation?” the narrator asks. “Our numbers are many and infinitely diverse, but the problems and dilemmas of climatic change concern us all.”

-- This feed and its contents are the property of The Huffington Post, and use is subject to our terms. It may be used for personal consumption, but may not be distributed on a website.



from The Huffington Post | The Full Feed http://ift.tt/2lRYYs7
via IFTTT
Republicans Think Trump Gave Them What They Wanted. They Should Think Again.

Republicans Think Trump Gave Them What They Wanted. They Should Think Again.

22:45 Add Comment





WASHINGTON ― President Donald Trump didn’t insult any war heroes. He didn’t pitch conspiracy theories about millions of illegal votes. He didn’t call the news media the “enemies of the American people.”


For Republicans nervously watching the new president for signs of calm leadership, that was the good news, as Trump stuck to his teleprompter for nearly all of his 5,000-word, hourlong address to a joint session of Congress on Tuesday night, the first of his term.


“I am asking all citizens to embrace this renewal of the American spirit,” Trump read, using language almost any president of either party might have used. “I am asking all members of Congress to join me in dreaming big, and bold and daring things for our country.”


Now for the bad news: Trump provided no details on how a promised replacement of the Affordable Care Act would work; how, precisely, tax reform would be structured or paid for; or even the functioning of his “trillion-dollar” infrastructure plan.


And all of that’s before Trump has had the chance to return to Twitter, as he is wont to do, where he’s not reading off a prepared script and can say what he really feels.


House Speaker Paul Ryan (R-Wis.) blasted out praise immediately after Trump had glad-handed his way out the House chamber, calling the speech “a home run” and thanking Trump for taking the lead on repealing Obamacare and reforming the tax code, long a priority for the congressman.



“I want to thank President Trump for putting us on a path to a better future,” Ryan said in the statement.


Ryan, though, may come to rethink that enthusiasm in the coming weeks and months.


Because Trump in many ways boxed in his Capitol Hill party mates even as he provided scant details on what should be done.


On health care, for example, Trump called for a replacement of the Affordable Care Act that would “expand choice, increase access, lower costs and at the same time provide better health care” ― an impossible combination.


His new plan, he said, would continue to insure those with preexisting conditions and use tax credits and health savings accounts to help Americans pay for them. How big would the tax credits be, and who would be eligible? Trump didn’t say, but he did promise: “The way to make health insurance available to everyone is to lower the cost of health insurance, and that is what we will do.”


On tax reform, Trump voiced continued support for lower rates on both corporations and individuals ― an idea that Republicans leaders like Ryan can easily support. “It will be a big, big, cut,” Trump promised. But then Trump added his support for including a feature to tax imports and subsidize exports, an idea that has Ryan is backing, but it’s already seeing powerful opponents in the business community and the Senate lining up.


On his much touted, trillion-dollar plan to rebuild roads, bridges and tunnels, Trump dispensed with it in 56 words. The only details offered were that it would include both public and private capital, and would create “millions of new jobs.”


As for a “compromise” on immigration reform with a pathway to at least legalization for undocumented immigrants ― as Trump earlier Tuesday had suggested he could support ― there was not a word, making it easy for Democrats to conclude there was no reason to work with Trump at all.


“Everything that is broken in our country can be fixed. Every problem can be solved,” Trump said. “Democrats and Republicans should get together and unite for the good of our country and for the good of the American people.”


Trump probably should not be surprised if the reality of making that happen is a good deal harder than reading words off of his teleprompter.


type=type=RelatedArticlesblockTitle=Related... + articlesList=58b6348fe4b0a8a9b7871d92,58b631a5e4b0780bac2e3f3c,58b630dee4b0a8a9b7871b12

-- This feed and its contents are the property of The Huffington Post, and use is subject to our terms. It may be used for personal consumption, but may not be distributed on a website.



from The Huffington Post | The Full Feed http://ift.tt/2lUOHKd
via IFTTT
Bill Gates Is Clueless On The Economy

Bill Gates Is Clueless On The Economy

22:45 Add Comment

Last week Bill Gates called for taxing robots. He argued that we should impose a tax on companies replacing workers with robots and that the money should be used to retrain the displaced workers. As much as I appreciate the world’s richest person proposing a measure that would redistribute money from people like him to the rest of us, this idea doesn’t make any sense.


Let’s skip over the fact of who would define what a robot is and how, and think about the logic of what Gates is proposing. In effect, Gates wants to put a tax on productivity growth. This is what robots are all about. They allow us to produce more goods and services with the same amount of human labor. Gates is worried that productivity growth is moving along too rapidly and that it will lead to large scale unemployment.


There are two problems with this story: First productivity growth has actually been very slow in recent years. The second problem is that if it were faster, there is no reason it should lead to mass unemployment. Rather, it should lead to rapid growth and increases in living standards.


Starting with the recent history, productivity growth has averaged less than 0.6 percent annually over the last six years. This compares to a rate of 3.0 percent from 1995 to 2005 and also in the quarter century from 1947 to 1973. Gates’ tax would slow productivity growth even further.


It is difficult to see why we would want to do this. Most of the economic problems we face are implicitly a problem of productivity growth being too slow. The argument that budget deficits are a problem is an argument that we can’t produce enough goods and services to accommodate the demand generated by large budget deficits. 



Gates’ notion that rapid productivity growth will lead to large-scale unemployment is contradicted by both history and theory.



The often told tale of a demographic nightmare with too few workers to support a growing population of retirees is also a story of inadequate productivity growth. If we had rapid productivity growth then we would have all the workers we need.


In these and other areas, the conventional view of economists is that productivity growth is too slow. From this perspective, if Bill Gates gets his way then he will be making our main economic problems worse, not better.


Gates’ notion that rapid productivity growth will lead to large-scale unemployment is contradicted by both history and theory. The quarter century from 1947 to 1973 was a period of mostly low unemployment and rapid wage growth. The same was true in the period of rapid productivity growth in the late 1990s.


The theoretical story that would support a high employment economy even with rapid productivity growth is that the Federal Reserve Board should be pushing down interest rates to try to boost demand, as growing productivity increases the ability of the economy to produce more goods and services. In this respect, it is worth noting that the Fed has recently moved to raise interest rates to slow the rate of job growth.


We can also look to boost demand by running large budget deficits. We can spend money on long neglected needs, like providing quality child care, education, or modernizing our infrastructure. Remember, if we have more output potential because of productivity growth, the deficits are not problem.


We can also look to take advantage of increases in productivity growth by allowing workers more leisure time. Workers in the United States put in 20 percent more hours each year on average than workers in other wealthy countries like Germany and the Netherlands. In these countries, it is standard for workers to have five or six weeks a year of paid vacation, as well as paid family leave and paid vacation. We should look to follow this example in the United States as well.


If we pursue these policies to maintain high levels of employment then workers will be well-positioned to secure the benefits of higher productivity in higher wages. This was certainly the story in the quarter century after World War II when real wages rose at a rate of close to two percent annually.


Of course these policies will not ensure that no workers ever suffer from automation. While we can never guarantee that no worker is harmed by improvements in technology in a dynamic economy, we can look to soften the impact.


One obvious policy would be to require severance pay, for example two weeks of pay for each year worked. This would both give displaced workers somewhat of a cushion and changes the incentives for employers. If a company knows that it faces large payout if it lays off a number of long-term employees, then it has more incentive to think about modernizing its facilities and retraining workers. This would be a win-win where the company has an interest in ensuring that its workers are as productive as possible while the workers get to keep their jobs.


In short, there is no reason that productivity growth should ever be viewed as the enemy of workers. We just need the right set of policies to ensure that they share in the gains.

-- This feed and its contents are the property of The Huffington Post, and use is subject to our terms. It may be used for personal consumption, but may not be distributed on a website.



from The Huffington Post | The Full Feed http://ift.tt/2lwQcx6
via IFTTT
Subway Denies Report That Its Chicken Is Only About 54 Percent Meat

Subway Denies Report That Its Chicken Is Only About 54 Percent Meat

22:45 Add Comment





Subway says its chicken is the real deal, despite some claims to the contrary


The chain’s chicken meat contains only about half real chicken DNA, according to the results of an investigation commissioned by Canada’s CBC News. The rest is mostly soy, the CBC says.


It’s often reported that fast food chicken has added ingredients. But Subway says the CBC’s claims are false, at least concerning its chicken served in both the U.S. and Canada.


“The accusations made... about the content of our chicken are absolutely false and misleading,” a Subway spokesman told HuffPost in a statement. “Our chicken is 100% white meat with seasonings, marinated and delivered to our stores as a finished, cooked product... We do not know how [CBC News] produced such unreliable and factually incorrect data, but we are insisting on a full retraction.”


The news report includes results from DNA tests of chicken at a number of fast-food restaurants. McDonald’s and Wendy’s were found to have around 85 percent chicken DNA in their products. Subway’s results were dramatically lower: Its oven roasted chicken was found to have 53.6 percent chicken DNA, and its chicken strips came out to just 42.8 percent.


Fast-food chicken often contains fillers like soy and water to maximize value and taste, and may even contain other chicken parts like fat or blood vessels, according to NPR. Indeed, Subway’s ingredients list mentions add-ins like water, soy protein and “chicken flavor” in addition to chicken breast. However, Subway Canada told CBS that the soy protein doesn’t add up to more than 1 percent of the total product.


Until this is all sorted out, we’ll be making our own chicken dinner at home. Here are some of our favorite recipes:


-- This feed and its contents are the property of The Huffington Post, and use is subject to our terms. It may be used for personal consumption, but may not be distributed on a website.



from The Huffington Post | The Full Feed http://ift.tt/2mqFs7z
via IFTTT
Missouri Supreme Court Upholds St. Louis' $11 Minimum Wage

Missouri Supreme Court Upholds St. Louis' $11 Minimum Wage

22:45 Add Comment

The Missouri Supreme Court gave low-wage workers in St. Louis a raise on Tuesday.


The five-judge panel issued a ruling upholding St. Louis’ minimum wage ordinance, saying it did not conflict with Missouri state law as business groups had argued. The decision means the city’s wage floor will soon rise to $10 per hour and then $11 in 2018.


St. Louis Mayor Francis Slay, a Democrat, tweeted that the ruling meant “higher wages for low wage workers,” adding that the city would give employers a “short but reasonable” grace period to get in line with the law.


The ruling is expected to make a significant difference to the lowest-paid workers in St. Louis. The Missouri state minimum wage is just $7.70, over $2 less than the city’s.


The city passed the ordinance in 2015, but it’s been tied up in court ever since. Businesses argued that the measure should be preempted by a 1998 law that barred localities from instituting minimum wages higher than the state level. The state Supreme Court agreed with a lower court’s ruling that that law was unconstitutional because of how it was passed.


The court also found that a separate state law passed in 2015 had no bearing on St. Louis’ minimum wage ordinance. That law forbids local minimum wages that weren’t in effect by Aug. 28, 2015. St. Louis’ measure was implemented that very day, making it legally sound, according to the judges.






The federal minimum wage is $7.25 per hour and hasn’t been raised since 2009. But as Congress leaves that wage floor untouched, cities and states around the country have gone ahead and raised their own rates in recent years, responding to public pressure from workers and labor groups.


The fight in St. Louis has been one of many “preemption” battles between states and cities. As labor activists have succeeded in passing local minimum wage hikes, Republican legislatures have responded by passing state laws that seek to nullify them. According to a recent report, 17 states now have preemption laws on the books that could block local wage raises.


Democrats and local activists argue that the state laws are meddling in local self-governance and keeping wages down. One of the most controversial preemption laws was passed in Alabama, where a mostly white state legislature blocked a minimum wage increase in predominantly black Birmingham.


The Fight for $15, a union-backed minimum wage campaign, issued a statement from St. Louis McDonald’s worker Bettie Douglas on Tuesday praising the Missouri Supreme Court ruling as a “major victory.”


“When we started our Fight for $15 an hour and union rights, nobody in Missouri gave us a chance to win,” Douglas said. “But by standing together and going on strike, we’ve secured life-changing raises for fast-food cooks and cashiers, janitors, and home care aides across the city.”

-- This feed and its contents are the property of The Huffington Post, and use is subject to our terms. It may be used for personal consumption, but may not be distributed on a website.



from The Huffington Post | The Full Feed http://ift.tt/2lTRPGg
via IFTTT

Here's A Video Of Travis Kalanick Chewing Out An Uber Driver

22:45 Add Comment



Ever wonder what your Uber driver really thinks of you?


For the sake of comparison, here’s a video of what it took for Uber CEO Travis Kalanick to earn a one-star rating.


Uber “black car” driver Fawzi Kamel captured this dash-cam video of Kalanick accompanied by two female passengers on Super Bowl Sunday and shared it with Bloomberg, which published the video Tuesday.


In it, Kalanick and his companions chat idly at first, discussing things like the weather and astrological signs (apparently Kalanick is a Leo, in case you were wondering).


At one point, one of the women makes a comment about Uber having a bad year, prompting Kalanick to respond, “I make sure every year is a hard year.” He adds, “That’s kind of how I roll. I make sure every year is a hard year. If it’s easy I’m not pushing hard enough.”



“I make sure every year is a hard year. That’s kind of how I roll. I make sure every year is a hard year. If it’s easy I’m not pushing hard enough.”



As the car arrives at its destination, however, Kamel can’t resist pressing Kalanick on the company’s compensation for drivers and decreasing fares.


To his credit, Kalanick appears to take the complaint ― which is a common one among Uber drivers ― seriously.


“So, we are reducing the number of black cars on the road over the next six months,” he tells Kamel, who responds encouragingly at first.


“But... you’re raising the standards and you’re dropping the prices,” Kamel responds. Kalanick replies, confused, “We’re not dropping the price on black.”


The two go back and forth several times, debating the company’s price structure, with Kalanick asserting his actions were necessary to save Uber from competition, and Kamel telling him drivers are hurting.


Kalanick says the company is considering rolling out a new “luxe” service that could demand higher fares, if Kamel is interested.


“But people are not trusting you anymore,” Kamel responds. “I lost $97,000 because of you. I’m bankrupt because of you. You keep changing [fares] every day.”


That seems to fire Kalanick up, who presses Kamel on his specific gripes about Uber’s more expensive black car service:


“Hold on a second,” Kalanick asks. “What have I changed about black? What? What?” 


“You changed the whole business,” says Kamel. “You dropped the prices [on black].”


“Bullshit!” replies Kalanick, who starts gathering his belongings as Kamel keeps pressing his case.


“You know what?” Kalanick asks rhetorically, clearly not interested in the rest of what Kamel has to say. “Some people don’t like to take responsibility for their own shit.” 


Then he adds, wagging his finger in the air as slides out of the car, “They blame everything in their life on somebody else.”


“Good luck,” Kalanick says, sarcastically, then slams the car door shut.


Uber didn’t immediately respond to a request for comment from The Huffington Post.


The video continues a string of high-profile hits for the company, including a lawsuit over claims it stole technology from a competitorallegations of rampant sexism, the resignation of a top engineer, and a #DeleteUber protest that forced Kalanick off President Donald Trump’s advisory council.

-- This feed and its contents are the property of The Huffington Post, and use is subject to our terms. It may be used for personal consumption, but may not be distributed on a website.



from The Huffington Post | The Full Feed http://ift.tt/2mCha7o
via IFTTT
Starbucks Gets Roasted On Twitter Over Its New Italian Roastery

Starbucks Gets Roasted On Twitter Over Its New Italian Roastery

22:45 Add Comment





Starbucks is stirring up some backlash over a decision to open its first location in Italy in late 2018.


The coffee chain announced Tuesday that it will open a new Reserve Roastery cafe in Milan next year. The Roastery will reside in the Poste di Milano building and take up some 25,000 square feet of space, according to a press release. Customers can expect goodies from Rocco Princi’s chain of bakeries, as well as small-batch Reserve coffee and, according to a Starbucks spokesperson, beer, wine and spirits as well. 



“Now we’re going to try, with great humility and respect, to share what we’ve been doing and what we’ve learned through our first retail presence in Italy,” Howard Schultz, CEO of Starbucks, said in a release. “Our first store will be designed with painstaking detail and great respect for the Italian people and coffee culture.” 


He added, “And, my hope is that we will create a sense of pride for our partners - so much so that every partner who sees our store or walks through the doors will say: ‘We got it right.’”


People on Twitter already have a lot to say about Starbucks moving to the holy grail of espresso. Let’s just say they’re not too happy about it: 






























And don’t even get people started on the palm trees Starbucks planted near the Piazza del Duomo in Milan as part of a landscaping project with the city. According to the Los Angeles Times, some people even tried to burn them


“We are happy the way we are,” 70-year-old Milan resident Christine Kung told the LA Times. “We don’t need to be invaded by American scenery. We already have McDonald’s and that’s enough.”



When asked about the backlash, a Starbucks spokesperson told The Huffington Post via email:  “Everything we’ve done to date sits on the foundation of the passion, craftsmanship and love Italian people have for great coffee. We are coming to Italy to learn from the best, but also to bring our own unique offer to the Italian consumer: a third place between home and work to take time and enjoy a perfectly crafted cup of coffee.  We believe that there is a strong consumer base in Italy.”


The HuffPost Lifestyle newsletter will make you happier and healthier, one email at a time. Sign up here.


type=type=RelatedArticlesblockTitle=Related... + articlesList=578cfc0de4b05e7343a66bea,57437410e4b0613b512b0c3a,58409281e4b0c68e047fdee3

-- This feed and its contents are the property of The Huffington Post, and use is subject to our terms. It may be used for personal consumption, but may not be distributed on a website.



from The Huffington Post | The Full Feed http://ift.tt/2lQzI5m
via IFTTT
YouTube Is Getting Into The Live TV Game

YouTube Is Getting Into The Live TV Game

22:45 Add Comment

Good news for cord cutters, YouTube is getting into live TV.


On Tuesday, the company announced its launching a new live and on-demand internet TV streaming service called YouTube TV.


Subscribers will have access to more than 30 networks, including ABC, CBS FOX, NBC, USA, FX and 10 sports networks, including ESPN, Fox Sports and NBCSN for $35 per month, in addition to paid YouTube content from YouTube Red. That price also includes six accounts, which allows for personalized recommendations for each member of the household, though only three accounts can stream at one time. 



Notably absent from YouTube’s service are Viacom-owned channels Discovery, A&E, AMC, TBS, TNT, MTV, Comedy Central and CNN. 


While no specific launch date has been announced as of yet, YouTube TV joins the growing space of internet TV streaming services as more people look for ways to say goodbye to traditional cable.


In addition to the more established Sling TV and Sony’s Playstation Vue, AT&T recently launched a similar service with DirecTVNow, though it seems to have been launched prematurely. As of January, The Verge called the service a “complete mess” citing frequent interruptions, missing features and billing issues as major problems. 

-- This feed and its contents are the property of The Huffington Post, and use is subject to our terms. It may be used for personal consumption, but may not be distributed on a website.



from The Huffington Post | The Full Feed http://ift.tt/2lTPuLr
via IFTTT
Trump Signs Executive Order Urging Dismantling Of Clean Water Rule

Trump Signs Executive Order Urging Dismantling Of Clean Water Rule

22:45 Add Comment

President Donald Trump is making good on a campaign promise to reverse a key environmental achievement of former President Barack Obama.


Trump on Tuesday signed an executive order targeting the controversial Waters of the United States rule, also known as the Clean Water Rule, as he advances his assault on the Environmental Protection Agency and environmental protections. Another executive order targeting Obama’s Clean Power Plan could be signed as soon as this week, according to previous reports.


Tuesday’s order instructs the EPA and Army Corps of Engineers to “review and reconsider” the rule, according to The Washington Post and other media outlets. Final language has not yet been released.


The rule, implemented in 2015, was intended to clarify which of the nation’s waterways should be protected under the federal Clean Water Act. It includes streams, wetlands and other smaller waterways that collectively provide drinking water for an estimated 117 million people — one in three Americans, according to the EPA.


The rule has been tied up in courts, however, with some 31 states, businesses and agricultural groups characterizing it as federal government overreach that would cripple industry.


A vocal critic of the rule has been EPA Administrator Scott Pruitt, who as Oklahoma attorney general sued the EPA over the rule, claiming it was unconstitutional and burdensome to farmers, developers and property owners. Pruitt reiterated his opposition to the rule, during an address at the Conservative Political Action Conference over the weekend, citing it as an example of overregulation.


Despite the Trump administration’s strong opposition to the rule, reversing it is no easy matter, triggering a new, potentially lengthy, rule-making process.


“It’s going to be hard to walk away from the huge scientific record the rule is based on,” Jon Devine, senior attorney at the Natural Resources Defense Council, told HuffPost. “If they try to run away from the legal test, that would be not only bad policy, but terrible law.”


Nevertheless, the order makes it clear that the Trump administration will attempt to do just that. The order urges the EPA and Army Corps of Engineers to consider limiting protected waterways to larger, navigable bodies of water. That definition would be consistent with what the late Supreme Court Justice Antonin Scalia wrote in the 2006 Rapanos v. United States case. That opinion, Devine pointed out, was shared by only four of the court’s justices. 


“It would blow a huge hole in the middle of the Clean Water Act,” Devine said. “If those waters are off limits, the act will be virtually ineffective.”


Former EPA Administrator Gina McCarthy also criticized the executive order. In light of reports of major EPA budget cuts, she characterized the order as giving “the illusion they’re fulfilling a campaign promise to gut the EPA.”


“Only a new rule based on a new record can make current rules go away,” McCarthy said in a statement. “The only thing these orders do is make clear this administration will defer needed public health protections for the American people for the sake of partisan politics.”


Others applauded Trump’s order.


American Farm Bureau Foundation President Zippy Duvall called Trump’s action “welcome relief to farmers and ranchers across the country.” The rule “has proven to be nothing more than a federal land grab, aimed at telling farmers and ranchers how to run their businesses,” Duvall said in a statement.


But not all agriculture groups were united in their support of Trump’s order.


Tom Driscoll, a spokesman for the National Farmers Union, said his organization opposed the clean water rule and supports its repeal. But he expressed concern with how the Trump administration will approach a revamp.


“I don’t think we’ve seen a lot to make us confident that this administration will revisit this rule in careful way that recognizes peoples’ concerns and protects shared water resources,” Driscoll told HuffPost.

-- This feed and its contents are the property of The Huffington Post, and use is subject to our terms. It may be used for personal consumption, but may not be distributed on a website.



from The Huffington Post | The Full Feed http://ift.tt/2l8BrEt
via IFTTT
Warren Buffett: 'When A Lady Says No, She Means Maybe'

Warren Buffett: 'When A Lady Says No, She Means Maybe'

22:45 Add Comment





Billionaire Warren Buffett has a long history of telling dirty old man style stories to explain boring business stuff. Most people usually overlook the creepiness because the Berkshire Hathaway CEO has cultivated a folksy manner and it’s kind of refreshing when a CEO isn’t a jargon-spewing automaton.


But in an interview with CNBC earlier this week, the 86-year-old crossed a line. Buffett was trying to explain why he and his investors made a public $143 billion bid to buy Unilever, even though as it turned out the consumer-goods conglomerate was emphatically not interested.


When Buffett’s people initially reached out, he explained to anchor Becky Quick, Unilever’s executive was apparently too polite and noncommittal ― leading to some confusion.


Then, he tried explain it all like this:


“Well, if a diplomat says yes, he means maybe. If he says maybe, he means no. And if he says no, he’s no diplomat. And if a lady says no, she means maybe. And if she says maybe, she means yes. And if she says yes, she’s no lady.”


This isn’t Buffett’s metaphor. It’s an old story, he said. And it’s one that’s clearly well past its expiration date. In 2017, it should be common knowledge that when it comes to courting a woman for romance or sex, no means no. And joking around about women giving mixed signals (they said no but meant yes) just helps perpetuate an illusion of consent that can lead to rape.


It’s pretty standard for Buffett to deploy dirty talk to explain dry and complex business concepts.


He offers a “quaint pattern of old jokes and creaky tropes,” is how a Bloomberg article describes him, while citing numerous examples of his quotes.


In a 2007 letter to investors, the billionaire likened bad business deals to women’s physical appearance, saying: “A line from Bobby Bare’s country song explains what too often happens with acquisitions: “I’ve never gone to bed with an ugly woman, but I’ve sure woke up with a few.”


The objectionable statement this time around comes at a time of heightened sensitivity to sexual harassment in the business realm. Ride-hailing giant Uber is facing charges that it cultivates a hostile atmosphere toward women; and on Monday night news broke of widespread sexual shenanigans at mall retailer Kay Jeweler.


A few people on Twitter were quick to take Buffett to task:










 


 


 






-- This feed and its contents are the property of The Huffington Post, and use is subject to our terms. It may be used for personal consumption, but may not be distributed on a website.



from The Huffington Post | The Full Feed http://ift.tt/2m9GV1u
via IFTTT

Cory Booker Joins Bernie Sanders In Backing Drug Re-Importation Bill

22:45 Add Comment





WASHINGTON ― Back in mid-January, while Democrats were still recovering from the shock of the presidential election, 13 Democrats cast a dead-of-night vote that in previous years would have gone largely unnoticed. 


It was against an amendment from Sen. Bernie Sanders (I-Vt.) that directed a Senate committee to write legislation allowing for the re-importation of cheaper prescription drugs from Canada. Perhaps the most prominent of the baker’s dozen was Sen. Cory Booker (D-N.J.), who just the day before had given controversial and impassioned testimony against Attorney General-nominee Jeff Sessions, at the time a fellow senator from Alabama. 


The backlash caught Booker and his colleagues by surprise, and in many ways it presaged the furious energy that would soon be unleashed by progressives against both Trump and elected Democrats unwilling to stand up to him. It was a sign that things had changed in Washington and that standard operating Democratic procedure would no longer be acceptable. 


The memo has been received. On Tuesday, Booker will join with Sanders at a press conference on Capitol Hill to announce his support for a drug re-importation bill. 


From a policy angle, Booker has previously been open to the idea of re-importing drugs from Canada and even voted that same night for a measure aimed at lowering drug costs. But politically, activists have long considered him to be a reliable ally of Big Pharma, which is a dominant industry in New Jersey. Thus, his break with the industry at a public event with Sanders is meaningful politically. If the goal of the resistance has been to stiffen the spines of Democrats, it’s working.


Of course, there is no policy without politics. If and when Democrats gain control of government, they’ll be under tremendous pressure from their base to follow through on their promise and do something about soaring drug costs. 


The drug industry is powerful in Pennsylvania, too, and Sen. Bob Casey (D-Pa.) joined Booker on that late-night vote in January. Since then, resistance in Pennsylvania has been fierce, with activists gathering every Tuesday to pressure lawmakers to oppose the Republican corporate agenda. Casey has not been immune and he faces re-election in 2018 in a state that Trump won with an upset victory. He, too, will join Booker and Sanders on Tuesday in announcing his backing of the bill. 


Booker and Casey said they were able to add robust safety provisions to the measure, which won over their support.


The bill is co-sponsored by Reps. Elijah Cummings (D-Md.) and Lloyd Doggett (D-Texas), as well as Sens. Martin Heinrich (D-N.M.) and Angus King (I-Maine).


Watch the full press conference below:





Take a survey: Should Senate Democrats work with President Trump where they can, or oppose him across the board?


CORRECTION: Texas Rep. Lloyd Doggett is a Democrat, not a Republican.

-- This feed and its contents are the property of The Huffington Post, and use is subject to our terms. It may be used for personal consumption, but may not be distributed on a website.



from The Huffington Post | The Full Feed http://ift.tt/2m9GGDB
via IFTTT
Hundreds Of Women Accuse Major Jewelry Chain Of Widespread Sexual Harassment

Hundreds Of Women Accuse Major Jewelry Chain Of Widespread Sexual Harassment

22:45 Add Comment





Jared the Galleria of Jewelers and Kay Jewelers’ parent company, Sterling Jewelers, is facing a class-action arbitration case from thousands of former and current employees, 250 of whom allege the company “fostered rampant sexual harassment and discrimination,” The Washington Post reported Monday.


Women at the company have come forward to say that they “were routinely groped, demeaned and urged to sexually cater to their bosses” during the late 1990s and 2000s. More than a dozen women initially filed for arbitration in 2008. 


Not all class members are alleging sexual impropriety. There are also accusations of wage violations, which argue that women were paid less than men and “passed over for promotions given to less experienced male colleagues.” 


This information hasn’t come to light until now because the employees’ attorneys were only granted permission to release the information publicly on Sunday. The case is being settled through arbitration (re: privately) and it’s not clear why it’s taken so long to settle.



Sanya Douglas, a Kay sales associate and manager in New York from 2003 to 2008, told the Post that a manager had a saying for male leaders coaxing women into sexual favors to advance their careers, calling it “going to the big stage.”


“If you didn’t do what he wanted with him,” she said in the 2012 sworn statement, “you wouldn’t get your [preferred] store or raise.”



Sterling Jewelers disputed the allegations, telling The Huffington Post in a statement that they believe “the story published by the Washington Post is patently misleading, as the referenced arbitration matter contains no legal claims of sexual harassment. We are currently seeking to have the Post correct this inaccurate story.”


They also said that they’ve “created strong career opportunities for many thousands of women working at our stores nationwide” and they’re taking the allegations “very seriously.”


Sterling also indicated that the allegations “involve a very small number of individuals” and that “they are not substantiated by the facts and certainly do not reflect our culture.”


Read the whole story here.

-- This feed and its contents are the property of The Huffington Post, and use is subject to our terms. It may be used for personal consumption, but may not be distributed on a website.



from The Huffington Post | The Full Feed http://ift.tt/2mBfTxq
via IFTTT
Schumer: Dems Are Done With Trump

Schumer: Dems Are Done With Trump

19:55 Add Comment

WASHINGTON — Senate Minority Leader Chuck Schumer pledged to give President Donald Trump a chance before his fellow New Yorker took the oath of office. But after 40 days, Schumer says he’s about through with the blustery commander in chief.


“It’s changed,” Schumer told The Huffington Post Tuesday shortly before Trump addressed a joint session of Congress.


“Trump, instead of doing where his campaign was, which was against both establishments, Democratic and Republican, so there might be some areas of common ground, has moved so far to the right that I don’t see any place we can work with him,” Schumer said. “He’s not even talking about infrastructure, he’s not talking about trade.”


When Schumer initially said he’d look for places to work with Trump, the then-president-elect had certainly alarmed most Democrats ― but some still hoped Trump would moderate on some issues, or at least make good on pledges that Democrats like Schumer liked, such as investing in infrastructure.


But since then, Trump has stood by his hard-line stances. And millions of Americans across the country have come out in droves to protest.


Schumer said it reminded him not so much of the tea party surge in 2010, or the Democratic wave of 2006, but the anti-war movement when Eugene McCarthy knocked President Lyndon Baines Johnson from office.


“I cut my eyeteeth in the Eugene McCarthy campaign of 1968,” Schumer said. “A ragtag group of grassroots activists, students and other assorted misfits toppled the most powerful man in the world, Lyndon Baines Johnson.”


“He was not as dishonorable as Trump, but he certainly was more powerful at that point in time. We beat him,” Schumer said. “I have not seen an outpouring that strong since that time.”


Schumer thinks Trump is likely to keep on inspiring Democrats, and pointed to recent local elections in Delaware and Connecticut as signs the party is surging.


“This bodes very well for 2018,” Schumer said. “If Trump continues to govern from the hard right, and be the same kind of person who doesn’t tell the truth, who makes it up as he goes along, and we stay united and strong, we could actually take back the Senate.”


Such an outcome would be remarkable. Democrats must defend 25 seats in 2018, including 10 in states Trump won, while Republicans only have nine incumbents facing re-election. Just two of them are in swing states.


Trump has certainly noticed Schumer, and has alternated between praising him and mocking him.


But Schumer insisted any attempts at manipulating him would fail.


“He thought by saying a few flattering things, he’s going to make me give up my values, and go work with him?” Schumer scoffed. “We’ll go by our values, and his values are so far away from ours that there’s not much ground for compromise. I’ve told him, all the flattery, all the name-calling, isn’t going to make a darn bit of difference. You’ve got to do the right thing. So far, he has not.”

-- This feed and its contents are the property of The Huffington Post, and use is subject to our terms. It may be used for personal consumption, but may not be distributed on a website.



from The Huffington Post | The Full Feed http://ift.tt/2mCQTWo
via IFTTT

How MLK’s I Have Dream speech was composed

14:07 Add Comment

Martin Luther King’s I Have a Dream speech is one of the greatest examples of American oratory. In this video, Evan Puschak looks at how King’s speech was constructed and delivered, examining King’s references to Lincoln’s Gettysburg Address & Shakespeare, his use of lyrical techniques like alliteration and anaphora (the repetition of a word or phrase at the beginning of successive clauses), and the mixture of plain and poetic language throughout the speech. Spoiler: King was a rhetorical genius and there’s a lot going on in that speech.

(Fair warning: Trump comes in abruptly at the 6:00 mark. I get the point he’s trying to make with the contrast, but I wish Puschak would have done without it.)

Tags: Evan Puschak   language   Martin Luther King   video

from kottke.org http://ift.tt/2mByUQm
via IFTTT

What if the Earth were a middle-aged adult and other comparisons

14:07 Add Comment

Sometimes big distances, long time periods, and large numbers can be difficult to grasp. So it helps to contextualize them with comparisons. When you do so, you realize that a billion is much much more than a million:

But when he linked these numbers to time, it brought things in perspective: 1 million seconds is nearly 12 days, whereas 1 billion seconds is almost 32 years. “Everybody gets it when you say it like that,” he wrote in an email. “If you just said 1 billion is three orders of magnitude greater than 1 million, I don’t think it would make the same impression.”

Tim Urban’s Life Calendar emphasizes the relative shortness of human life and the importance of using your time well by reorganizing a human lifespan into weeks.

Each row of weeks makes up one year. That’s how many weeks it takes to turn a newborn into a 90-year-old.

It kind of feels like our lives are made up of a countless number of weeks. But there they are — fully countable — staring you in the face.

High school chemistry teacher Ward Q. Normal recently imagined the Earth having the lifespan of a typical human, which is a useful way of thinking about young humanity is in comparison.

Earth’s about half-way through its life. If it were a middle-aged adult of 40, its last mass extinction happened about 7 months ago.

To 40-yr-old Earth, humans have been using tools for a week and a half, and just left Africa 8 hours ago to settle around the globe.

All of human history is the last half hour. It’s been an exhilarating and disastrous half hour. But we figured out some really cool shit.

We figured out quantum, relativity, and DNA. A randomly mutating and replicating molecule built a machine to figure itself out.

Even much older evolutionary changes are surprisingly recent on this scale. Spines debuted just over 4 yrs ago. About when iPhone 5 did.

For more on the visualization of large scales, see also Powers of Ten, the leisurely pace of light speed, the size of supermassive black holes, and this comparison of the sizes of things from the Moon to galactic superclusters and beyond:

You want to talk about human insignificance? If Betelgeuse, one of the largest stars shown in the video, were in the Sun’s place, it would nearly reach the orbit of Jupiter, from which light takes 43 minutes (on average) to reach the Earth. (via @stevesilberman)

Tags: Earth   long zoom   science   Tim Urban   Ward Q. Normal

from kottke.org http://ift.tt/2m4c0mK
via IFTTT

This Is What Democracy Looks Like

14:05 Add Comment

Take a look...





This is what democracy looks like.


At least on February 25, 2017 - in front of the Federal Building in West Los Angeles.


I haven’t been to a political rally or a real protest since 1968 - SUNY Buffalo, where I went to college. It was an SDS rally (Students for Democratic Society), against the Vietnam War, or for civil rights, or for women’s rights, or for human rights; there were a lot of people we wanted to set free back in the day. We even had some modest success.


But I didn’t even go to the Women’s March last month in downtown LA, much to my embarrassment. I was afraid to bring my son, for fear that some pro-Trump, anti-women protesters would become violent and cause us some physical harm. It turned out to be a beautifully peaceful and empowering protest of the first order, and it joined Woodstock as another culturally-defining event - that I missed.


But what are we supposed to do now? Post-Women’s March? One month into the disastrous and frightening Trump administration? That’s the question, isn’t it? Instead of feeling somewhere between impotent and enraged every day we turn on the TV, read the newspaper, or scan the ubiquitous anti-Trump online magazines, blogs, and Facebook posts.... what can we do?



There are so many of us - afraid, depressed, enraged - it’s not like anyone is unaffected. Immigration? Who doesn’t know a gardener, a housekeeper, a neighbor, a brother-in-law (mine spent time in Pinochet’s stadium in Chile), or a wife (mine is a U.S. citizen who came here from Indonesia 16 years ago) whose status isn’t now threatened... by the USCIS hiring thousands of more employees, by ICE rounding up undocumented American residents, following children home from school to identify and deport their parents?


Healthcare? Social Security? Medicare? The Affordable Healthcare Act? Who doesn’t know someone who isn’t deleteriously effected, if not themselves personally?



Me? I’m retiring after 30 years as a theater professor from a safe and secure job at the University of Southern California. What a time I picked to do it! Right upon the election of MadDog Trump and his hysterical, inconsistent, macho-conservative wave of executive orders and his hiring of the most frightening, plutocratic, pro-business/anti-global, nationalistic Cabinet in American history. Of course we’re afraid. What’s going to happen to this country - other than be dismantled one day at a time - in such a predictable, frightening onslaught of daily press releases and bad news... for immigrants, poor people, middle class people, doctors, nurses, plumbers, taxi drivers, you name it - we’re all terrified.


But what can we do? It certainly seems like we have to do something, right? Like I have to do something! It’s just like the ‘60s, man, when my ass, when all of America’s sons’ asses, were on the line ― to be drafted. It’s once again personal. Like, I might lose my Social Security benefits. Lose my Medicare entitlement. Not be able to afford health care for my wife and son.


We just can’t stand by and watch this happen.


Solution?


We have to choose a specific issue - or two - and stand up, let our voices be heard. We have to call our Congressmen, show up at the Federal Building...



Do something.... more than click on Facebook, answer surveys, and send a few dollars which make us think we’re making a difference.


My two issues, for the sake of this argument, are health care and immigration. They effect me personally. The results of Trump’s executive orders and his reliable threat of changing the laws are not only scary and depressing, they are practical and debilitating. I have to write and call my Congressmen. I have to show up at the Federal Building and post this blog on HuffPost.


Call your state senator and tell them to support SB 562, a bill for single-payer healthcare in California.


Call 855-271-8515 from your phone to be automatically connected to your state senator.


Or call Ricardo Lara, the Congressman in Sacramento who’s drafting the bill: 916-651-4033.


TALKING POINTS: WHAT YOU CAN SAY ABOUT WHY YOUR STATE SENATOR SHOULD SUPPORT A UNIVERSAL SINGLE-PAYER HEALTH CARE SYSTEM:


-This bill will save people’s lives.


-SB 562 would ensure that every person receives the health care they need when they need it.


-No longer will the cost of prescription drugs and medical procedures be unattainable.


-In the wealthiest nation in the history of the world, people have a right to health care, no matter their income or medical history.


We have to stand together. Shoulder to shoulder. We have to raise our voices. Protest. Resist. Now is the time. Whether you believe we’re on the verge of a dictatorial, new kind of American fascism or not, run by a not-very-intelligent, loose cannon, self-styled, impulsive narcissist, or not... things are definitely, without a doubt, on the line.


We can’t wait 2 years for new Democrats to be elected to Congress. We can’t wait 4 years for a new presidential election. So much pain and damage can be done right now... in the next week, in the next month, in the next years... We just have to stand up NOW to the horror and misdirection of this administration.


I know, I’m not a politician. Or a wise man. Just an ordinary one who’s terrified and disheartened by what’s happening in my own country. A man, once a boy, who grew up in a country which believed in itself. Which believed in democracy. In freedom. In opportunity for all.


We can’t let go of these beliefs by shipping people out of the country. Democracy was built on, is still built upon, diversity, upon the amalgamation of cultures and ideas. Strength from debate, argument, and differences.


Look again at these pictures.



Join the next line of protest signs. Stand up. Raise your voice.

This is what democracy looks like!



Trules’ Twiter handle: etrules

Website: http://www.erictrules.com

Trules’ new travel blog, “e-travels with e.trules ”

-- This feed and its contents are the property of The Huffington Post, and use is subject to our terms. It may be used for personal consumption, but may not be distributed on a website.



from The Huffington Post | The Full Feed http://ift.tt/2lTBS2O
via IFTTT
Logobook, a catalog of great logos

Logobook, a catalog of great logos

09:03 Add Comment

Logobook

Logobook is a growing catalog of “the finest logos, symbols & trademarks” in the world. The 5000+ logos are divided into groups like letters & numbers, shapes, animals, objects, and nature and are extensively categorized by industry, designer, and country of origin. Great resource.

They’re backed up with new submissions right now, but you can still send them your logos and they’ll get back to you when submissions are open again. (via @buzz)

Tags: branding   design   logos

from kottke.org http://ift.tt/2lvdBiw
via IFTTT

The Complacent Class

07:22 Add Comment

Tyler Cowen’s new book, The Complacent Class, comes out today. In it, he argues that as a society, Americans have stopped taking risks, are too comfortable, and rely too heavily on incremental improvements of existing goods & ideas, which has resulted in a stagnation of our culture and economy. This video by Cowen is a good introduction to what he means by that.

After about the 1970s, innovation on this scale slowed down. Computers and communication have been the focus. What we’ve seen more recently has been mostly incremental improvements, with the large exception of smart phones.

This means that we’ve experienced a ton of changes in our virtual world, but surprisingly few in our physical world. For example, travel hasn’t much improved and, in some cases, has even slowed down. The planes we’re primarily using? They were designed half a century ago.

Since the 1960s, our culture has gotten less restless, too. It’s become more bureaucratic. The sixties and seventies ushered in a wave of protests and civil disobedience. But today, people hire protests planners and file for permits. The demands for change are tamer compared to their mid-century counterparts.

Time published an excerpt of the book last week:

Americans traditionally have thought of themselves as the great movers, and indeed that was true in the nineteenth century and even through most of the twentieth. But since the 1980s, Americans have become much less restless in movements across the country, and more people are looking to simply settle down and entrench themselves.

Here is this change in a single number: The interstate migration rate has fallen 51 percent below its 1948-1971 average, and that number has been falling steadily since the mid-1980s. Or, if we look at the rate of moving between counties within a state, it fell 31 percent. The rate of moving within a county fell 38 percent. Those are pretty steep drops for a country that has not changed its fundamental economic or political systems. You might think that information technology (IT) would make it easier to find a job on the other side of the country, and maybe it has, but that has not been the dominant effect. If anything, Americans have used the dynamism of IT to help ourselves stay put, not to move around.

And in a recent piece in the NY Times that mentions Cowen’s book, David Brooks references a piece by Nicholas Eberstadt called Our Miserable 21st Century:

That means there’s an army of Americans semi-attached to their communities, who struggle to contribute, to realize their capacities and find their dignity. According to Bureau of Labor Statistics time-use studies, these labor force dropouts spend on average 2,000 hours a year watching some screen. That’s about the number of hours that usually go to a full-time job.

Fifty-seven percent of white males who have dropped out get by on some form of government disability check. About half of the men who have dropped out take pain medication on a daily basis. A survey in Ohio found that over one three-month period, 11 percent of Ohioans were prescribed opiates. One in eight American men now has a felony conviction on his record.

If you need a chaser, consider this from the introductory chapter of Homo Deus by Yuval Noah Harari (which I’m currently reading):

For the first time in history, more people die today from eating too much than from eating too little; more people die from old age than from infectious diseases; and more people commit suicide than are killed by soldiers, terrorists and criminals combined. In the early twenty-first century, the average human is far more likely to die from bingeing at McDonald’s than from drought, Ebola or an al-Qaeda attack.

Tags: books   David Brooks   Homo Deus   Nicholas Eberstadt   The Complacent Class   Tyler Cowen   video   Yuval Noah Harari

from kottke.org http://ift.tt/2l80Oq8
via IFTTT
Get Turned On The Old Venetian Way With These Sexy Flap Books

Get Turned On The Old Venetian Way With These Sexy Flap Books

06:25 Add Comment

Move along, nothing to see here ― right? Just an elegant lady enjoying a leisurely gondola ride with her elderly female chaperone, a depiction of a proper young woman going about daily life in 16th-century Venice.


But wait, let’s look again:



Oh my! A lifted flap reveals a far more scandalous scene; instead of a chaperone, the lady is accompanied by a dashing gentleman who appears to be feeling her up. 


This erotic interactive flap book, currently on view at the New York Public Library’s Stephen A. Schwarzman building, was illustrated by Donato Bertelli in the late 16th century. The book is part of “Venice in Love,” an exhibition featuring the NYPL’s collections of erotic and romantic artifacts from the Republic of Venice, which existed as an independent state from the 13th to 18th centuries.


In her description of the exhibition, curator Madeleine Viljoen notes that Venice, a relatively liberated secular state, was “famed for its high-end courtesans and low-end prostitutes,” as well as the beauty and elaborate grooming of its women. Throughout its lifetime, the state became “a prime destination for lovers and pleasure seekers,” along with art-lovers ― and the exhibition puts on display the union between Venice’s artistic proclivities and its erotic ones.




As for Bertelli’s peekaboo love scene, why hide the romantic embrace behind another drawing? Viljoen, also the NYPL prints curator, told The Huffington Post in an email that the purpose of the interactive flap book was clearly sexual. “The Venetian flap books,” she said, “were designed with the titillation of the viewer in mind.”


Another flap book leans even more explicitly softcore, allowing readers to enact a pre-photographic version of an upskirt shot:




Viljoen’s description of the exhibition calls attention to the young woman’s “underwear and platform shoes, known as chopines” ― a sexy getup for the time.


These two flap books aren’t just eye-grabbing; they’re highly unusual. “There has been much interest in recent years in so-called interactive prints,” Viljoen told HuffPost. However, “[t]hese were usually didactic and included items like paper astrolabes or anatomical studies ... except for the books shown in the Library’s collection, I cannot think of any other examples of specifically erotic flap books.”


The sensuous images found in the NYPL’s Venetian prints don’t look much like modern day erotica ― in olden days, after all, a glimpse of stocking was looked upon as something shocking ― but boast the same twinkle of subversive playfulness that still titillates frisson-seekers today. “The act of lifting the curtain from the young lovers or of raising the courtesan’s skirt seems quintessentially voyeuristic,” Viljoen told HuffPost.


When it comes to the erotic, some things never change.



-- This feed and its contents are the property of The Huffington Post, and use is subject to our terms. It may be used for personal consumption, but may not be distributed on a website.



from The Huffington Post | The Full Feed http://ift.tt/2m2OdDG
via IFTTT
Serena Williams Strolls By A Park And Challenges Two Random Dudes To Tennis

Serena Williams Strolls By A Park And Challenges Two Random Dudes To Tennis

04:55 Add Comment

These guys must still be pinching themselves.


Tennis superstar Serena Williams was strolling by a park with fiancé Alexis Ohanian and her dog, Chip, in San Francisco Sunday night when she spotted two men playing singles, news outlets reported.


Despite wearing furry boots, Williams playfully challenged the two to a match.


They recognized her, but who in the world would turn down a one-in-a-gazillion shot at exchanging shots with arguably the G.O.A.T.? Not these two. One of them offered her a racket and it was game-on.


Check out Williams’ Snapchat entry of the encounter, which For The Win’s Alysha Tsuji edited:  






“The moral of the story is that you never know when I’ll be coming to a tennis court near you,” she said.

-- This feed and its contents are the property of The Huffington Post, and use is subject to our terms. It may be used for personal consumption, but may not be distributed on a website.



from The Huffington Post | The Full Feed http://ift.tt/2m7J91g
via IFTTT

Ed Sheeran Joins Jimmy Fallon To Play ‘Shape Of You’ On Classroom Instruments

04:55 Add Comment



Ed Sheeran schooled Jimmy Fallon in the art of music as they played his new hit “Shape of You” on classroom instruments.


On Monday’s broadcast of “The Tonight Show,” the British pop star was joined by Fallon and his house band The Roots for the playground-style rendition.


Who knew that a banana-shaped percussion shaker could be so soulful?


Check it out above, and see how it compares to the original version below:





type=type=RelatedArticlesblockTitle=Related Coverage + articlesList=58a6a041e4b07602ad53531b,58381236e4b09b60560063c3,581f19d5e4b0aac62484ff47,58b15d0be4b0780bac29c1ef

-- This feed and its contents are the property of The Huffington Post, and use is subject to our terms. It may be used for personal consumption, but may not be distributed on a website.



from The Huffington Post | The Full Feed http://ift.tt/2lRPUSp
via IFTTT
Tuesday's Morning Email: Inside Trump's Proposed Budget Cuts To The State Department and EPA

Tuesday's Morning Email: Inside Trump's Proposed Budget Cuts To The State Department and EPA

04:55 Add Comment


TOP STORIES


(And want to get The Morning Email each weekday? Sign up here.)






PRESIDENT DONALD TRUMP TO SELL VISION FOR BUDGET IN TONIGHT’S ADDRESS TO A JOINT SESSION OF CONGRESS As well as explain his plans for deep cuts to the EPA, State Department, and other parts of the federal budget in order to pay for a hike in military spending. Cuts to entitlement programs are not currently on the chopping block, which could cause tensions with Republicans in Congress. And try your hand at balancing the federal budget with this interactive. [HuffPost]


JEWISH COMMUNITY CENTERS AND DAY SCHOOLS HIT WITH ANOTHER WAVE OF THREATS Bomb threats to at least 13 Jewish community centers and eight day schools forced evacuations in 16 states. [HuffPost]


COMPANY THAT OWNS KAY JEWELERS AND JARED THE GALLERIA OF JEWELRY FACES MASSIVE SEXUAL HARASSMENT CASE “Declarations from roughly 250 women and men who worked at Sterling, filed as part of a private class-action arbitration case, allege that female employees at the company throughout the late 1990s and 2000s were routinely groped, demeaned and urged to sexually cater to their bosses to stay employed.” [WaPo]


GEORGE W. BUSH PRAISED THE FREE PRESS AND A WELCOMING IMMIGRATION SYSTEM Which is hard to interpret as anything but shade thrown at the current president. [HuffPost]


THAT OSCARS GAFFE? WATCHED BY THE SMALLEST AUDIENCE SINCE 2008 Just 32.9 million viewers tuned in. Here’s how Sammy Davis Jr. handled a similar flub with grace over 50 years ago. And another massive gaffe at the Oscars? The In Memoriam segment featured the photo of a woman who is very much alive. [HuffPost]


SPACEX WILL SEND TWO PRIVATE CITIZENS AROUND THE MOON IN 2018 We’d volunteer, but apparently large sums of money have already been exchanged. [HuffPost]


HERE ARE THE 12 FAMILIES OF BACTERIA THE WORLD HEALTH ORGANIZATION SAYS WE NEED NEW ANTIBIOTICS FOR The WHO called these “priority pathogens” the greatest threats to human health. [Reuters]






WHAT’S BREWING






HAVE AN AMAZON ALEXA? Make sure to check out our new flash briefing, which you can activate by setting up HuffPost as a news source in your device. Then say, “What’s my flash briefing?” or “what’s new?” for your HuffPost rundown for the day!


MEET THE PwC EMPLOYEE RESPONSIBLE FOR ONE OF THE BIGGEST OSCAR GAFFES OF ALL TIME Brian Cullinan definitely had a rocky Monday after his mistake caused PricewaterhouseCoopers a maelstrom of negative press. At least we all got this Meryl Streepreaction gif? [HuffPost]


AND YOU THOUGHT THE DRESSES DURING THE OSCARS WERE SOMETHING... The after-party outfits were on a whole other level.  Heck, Gabrielle Union basically invented a new category: bikini-cover-up combos. And Viola Davis rocked sneakers. But the best moment of the night? It’s a tie between the pure friendship expressed in this hug between Best Actress winners Emma Stone and Brie Larson and Jeremy Renner walking his three-year-old daughter down the red carpet. [HuffPost]


PEOPLE HAD A LOT OF FEELINGS ABOUT HALLE BERRY’S HAIR AT THE OSCARS We loved it. We also loved her ingenious “Versace on the Floor” post. [HuffPost]


RBG WORKS OUT HARDER THAN YOU DO At least according to this Politico journalist, who was huffing and puffing after the 83-year-old Supreme Court Justice’s workout, which she completes twice a week. [Politico






BEFORE YOU GO






~ In an interview airing this morning on “Fox and Friends,” the president says he believes Barack Obama is behind the town hall protests.


~ This Smithsonian piece on the “great escape of the Holocaust” is a must-read.


~ Here’s why you might find a little plastic baby hiding in your king’s cake today. 


~ Why weren’t we invited to one of the world’s largest food fights that involves over 500,000 pounds of oranges? And want more bizarre news? Check out our Weird News email.


~ You decide ― is this photo of Kellyanne Conway in the Oval Office worth all the memes?


~ Your favorite “Gossip Girl” angst-ridden crush just got married.


~ The beauty of centenarians, in portraits. 


~ There really is nothing better than MLB photo day.


~ Make sure to test your knowledge of the news by checking out our HuffPost’s Headline Quiz.


~ Be right back, counting down the minutes until we get new music from Lorde.


~ Kate Middleton proved you didn’t need to be at the Oscars to look like  a star.


~ “How to use dark matter detectors to catch a uranium thief.”


~ Woof: Looks like there won’t be a dog in the White House, which is almost as sad as the joke preceding this news.


~ The Atlantic has a nifty new tool that shows you your life in the context of historical events. We’re a bit sad to hear that iTunes factors so heavily into our timeline, but alas.






 

-- This feed and its contents are the property of The Huffington Post, and use is subject to our terms. It may be used for personal consumption, but may not be distributed on a website.



from The Huffington Post | The Full Feed http://ift.tt/2luqaur
via IFTTT